Gift — Bluewave Partners tablet · USD 610

G&E Declaration · filed by Fatima Al Zarooni · 15 September 2026 · 11:48

What Fatima Al Zarooni has declared before

Automated pre-approval decision

Produced by the declaration flow when this was filed, from the rules in force at the time. Never changed by a decision below.

Suggested

Review required

Above the USD 300 threshold; returned once for a missing counterparty name.

Flags

Pre-approval required

Above the USD 300 threshold; returned once for a missing counterparty name.

Compliance Policy

Screening

Not screened yet

Fatima Al Zarooni · Bluewave Partners has not been checked against screening database.

The submission

Every field of the Gift & Entertainment Intake form, in the order it asks for it.

Direction: gave or received*Received
Category: gift, entertainment, or both*Gift — tablet
Event date(s)*Standard terms
Counterparty name*Bluewave Partners
Counterparty's employer / firm*Bluewave Partners
Counterparty type / relationship*Bluewave Partners
Government official / public-plan affiliation*No
Additional employee(s) involvedNot applicable
Employee attendance confirmed (entertainment component)*Confirmed by the employee at submission
Gift value (per person)*610
Gift description*Not applicable
Type of entertainment*Gift — tablet
Entertainment value (per person)*610
Entertainment description*No further details beyond what is described above.
Currency*USD
Combined 12-month aggregation check*Not applicable
Was it solicited? (Received only)*Yes
Connected to a pending or active business matter?*No
Business purpose / reason*Relationship building after a completed engagement
Preclearance / disposition affirmation*Investment Officer, Private Markets
Full nameFatima Al Zarooni
Position & departmentInvestment Officer, Private Markets
Date of G&E13 September 2026
Estimated value (USD)610
Evidence attachedReceipt added on resubmission

Decision

CurrentlyReview

Set it to

Reason (optional)

Your name and the time are recorded with the decision. Earlier decisions are kept, not replaced.

Decision history

No officer has ruled on this yet. It is at review because that is where every filing starts.